School District Bans the Phrase "Merry Christmas"
By: Deanna King
Updated: November 21, 2011
A school board member says the policy was adopted in 2001 as part of "The No Child Left Behind Act" in order to receive federal funding. However, parents and teachers say they have never heard of these rules until now.
The school board is asking principals in the district to enforce the policy. We obtained a copy of a memo titled "Religious Expression in Schools." It states "It would inappropriate to organize a Christmas party for a classroom or school." Parties now have to be called "multicultural celebrations." Religious symbols such as Christmas trees, angels and menorahs can only be used in lesson plans.
As far as holiday concert is concerned the program has to be "balanced." Certain songs and expressions are not allowed. The email says "e.g. Merry Christmas should not be included in any spoken or written remarks."
"I'm not happy at all," said Derek Buckingham. He says it's not fair to his children and other students who celebrate the holiday. "They do enough to take Christianity out of school. Now, they're taking Christmas too?"
We spoke to several teachers who are upset about the policy. Parents say the district's attempt to be politically correct has gone too far. "I'm just appalled that they would do away with Merry Christmas. It's been Christmas all these years and now to a bunch of people that's not politically correct," said Lucy Hudson, a parent of a child in the district. "I think that's a bunch of baloney."
Superintendent Margaret Puzio contacted us and says the memo we received was not meant for the public. It was just "talking points" for faulty meetings. She says if teachers want to put up a Christmas Tree as part of a non-secular display it would be allowed.
Comments
Flag says: That is really sweet. I don't think Jesus would like that attitude. This great nation is for all, not just for those who think/believe as you do. My family came here in 1632 and I don't intend to leave. This is where I am guaranteed freedom of and from religion - also known as the great melting pot. No one wants to take away anyone's religion or heritage, but the government should not be promoting one rellgion over the thousands of others.
Neither should be on any public land, but if one is allowed than all should be allowed including Muslims, [censored], etc.
etc. Not enough space to display the symbols for the thousands of religions. Who should be left out? Wouldn't it be better to display these things in front of their own churches?
etc, etc.,
Flag says: You can say that any time you want. The point is the government can't promote a particular religion.[/quote]
Okay good we got that straight now to the next level the government must protect my right to religion and the practice correct. If this is true and it is if my thrd grade class wants to erect a nativity scene on the front yard of the school house next to a Hanacha lamp then it follows that the government must protect my right to do just that! after all just what Liberties are being violated?
Flag says: You can say that any time you want. The point is the government can't promote a particular religion.
Flag says: You said it - "family and friends". No one is taking Christmas away from you. You may say Merry Christmas all day long and celebrate in your home and church and other private places any time you want, but the government may not promote your religion. What is so difficult to understand about that? I'll bet you would love it if the teacher asked the students to get out their prayer mats and said it is time for a prayer to Mohammed.
Flag says: Certainly celebration of Christmas infringes on the rights of everyone who is not Christian. The government needs to remain neutral regarding reilgion.[/quote]
Please I don't mean to be impertinent but would you state which rights or rather Liberties are infringed upon when i say Merry Christmas to a devout Jew or Muslim ?
Flag says: Certainly celebration of Christmas infringes on the rights of everyone who is not Christian. The government needs to remain neutral regarding reilgion.
Flag says: I don't know if Ben really wrote that, but I do know it has been around for years.
I am a Jew, and every single one of my ancestors was Jewish. And it does not bother me even a little bit when people call those beautiful lit up, bejeweled trees, Christmas trees. I don't feel threatened. I don't feel discriminated against. That's what they are, Christmas trees.
It doesn't bother me a bit when people say, 'Merry Christmas' to me. I don't think they are slighting me or getting ready to put me in a ghetto. In fact, I kind of like it. It shows that we are all brothers and sisters celebrating this happy time of year.
I don't like getting pushed around for being a Jew, and I don't think Christians like getting pushed around for being Christians. I think people who believe in God are sick and tired of getting pushed around, period. I have no idea where the concept came from, that America is an explicitly atheist country.
Flag says: Of course we do, but we don't have the right to impose it on others in public schools. No one is stopping you from saying Merry Christmas or whatever you want. The point is not to impose your religion or any religion on public school children. Why isn't it enough to celebrate in your home and in your church and in any other private place? Why do you need the government to promote your religion? Any religion worth anything should not need the government to promote it. It should easily and happily stand on its own.
Flag says: Why can't you understand that this is religious freedom - freedom for everyone? Why should Christians' holiday be the ONE celebrated? It is unconstitutional for the government to promote any religion. In this great nation we are guaranteed freedom of and from religion. That is why the government needs to remain neutral. If you want your children to celebrate Christmas in school send them to a private Christian school.
Flag says; Very well said. Many Christians cannot accept that there is any other religion (or at least any that should be celebrated) when in fact there are thousands.
Flag says: What you are failing to realize is that neutrality by the government is a win for all religions. The government should not be promoting any religion over any other.
please cite for me the Constitutional authority to ban government promotion of religion[/quote]
Establishment Clause: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion."
Who said anything about being an atheists or anti-american? Are you saying all Americans are Christian and celebrate Christmas since according to you it is the "American culture." You said it perfectly- "if you do not celebrate it then don't celebrate it." The first step to being able to do so is by not being forced to celebrate at a public school.
You can't ban free speech, but you can ban government promotion of religion.[/quote]
please cite for me the Constitutional authority to ban government promotion of religion
Flag says: It is refreshing to read that a few people really get it. Thanks for your post.
No, we are guaranteed freedom of and from religion. Religion is not the law of the land. We are governed by the US Constitution which so carefully was written without any religious references. "Under God" and "In God we trust" wasn't added until the 1950s.
Agreed! Then lets see people change their minds about CHRISTMAS! Bet they'd all want it back. Except those you don't contribute to the work force, of course, because that's "their" rights too. This country was formed on religion, so quickly a lot have forgotten.
You can't ban free speech, but you can ban government promotion of religion.
How do you teach respect if one religion is promoted? What about all the children whose families are not Christian???
Laura O
You are right about that. The term is an offshoot of the phrase, "wall of separation between church and state," as written in Thomas Jefferson's letter to the Danbury Baptist Association in 1802.
If you look at some of the Supreme Court cases you will see how invaluable it has been. I have been on the Board of Americans United for the Separation of Church and State for decades. I invite you to review some of their work and you will quickly see how important it is to all of us.
Very well stated...
Good grief, You can say it 'til the cows come home. Can't you see that it is only about the government (school district) not establishing religion or promoting a particular religion. .
The separation of church and state in our great nation is what separates us from other nations. It should be highly valued,[/quote]
Dear Fran,
The constitution does not state a separation of church and state but rather that the government could not establish a state religion, such as the Church of England. When this country began many people came here to escape religious persecution. So to help prevent that, the founding fathers put in the Constitution that the state or government could not dictate what religion you had to be. So the state cannot dictate but the people can express their religious beliefs in the public domain.
We need only look to the words of our founding fathers:
"The Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion." - John Adams, 1796
The separation of church and state in our great nation is what separates us from other nations. It should be highly valued,
Public schools are for all. Would it be okay if someone of a different religion was proselytizing to your child? Parents can teach their children anything they want to about religion, but why would you want their school teachers to take on that role? Certainly there should be lessons and discussions about religion from a historical perspective, but no teacher or administrator should impose their particular religion on any child.
This right here says it all, but you have to be able to get the joke.
I wonder how many of the Christmas-haters out there have the courage of their convictions to turn down a gift, or show up for work on 25 December?[/quote]
I could not have said it better.
This right here says it all, but you have to be able to get the joke.
I wonder how many of the Christmas-haters out there have the courage of their convictions to turn down a gift, or show up for work on 25 December?
Ok. Lets grow up, why are people crying over the words merry christmas? Saying those words are not forcing religion on anyone.This Easter tell the children they are no longer aloud to say Happy Easter to anyone.
Neutrality is not bigotry.[/quote] There is nothing wrong with Christmas in school,the public schools should still be teaching the bible. kids need religion in there lives, this country is going to straight to hell.[/quote]
The United States has always been comprised of different faiths and cultures. If you don't like the melting, you should get out of the pot.
I could not agree more, Lorri[/quote]
I don't quite understand this comment. The whole point of this policy seems to be that Christ IS a part of Christmas, and the district doesn't want to give a governmental endorsement of any one religion in a public capacity.
Neutrality is not bigotry.[/quote] There is nothing wrong with Christmas in school,the public schools should still be teaching the bible. kids need religion in there lives, this country is going to straight to hell.
Neutrality is not bigotry.
your a bigot.
I could not agree more, Lorri
It is also important to teach children about all religions, including Christianity. When I was in school, at our annual holiday concert we sang songs from all faiths and our choir director used to emphasize the fact that all these different beliefs still used music as expression. An important lesson in tolerance.
Also, does this now mean that the School will be giving other religions Holy days off? Will students now have off for Yom Kippur, Ramadan? Or will school breaks still be dictated by Christmas and Easter? You can not just take out Christmas in the name of inclusion and call it a day.
Hopefully you are teaching morals regardless of where your children are, If you want christian indoctrination why not send them to a private christian school?.
No one is taking Christ out of Christmas it is just taking indoctrination out of public schools.


